Types of Mortgage Fraud

Posted by eddie on Dec 24th, 2007
2007
Dec 24

In order to get the best mortgage you can you must know how to play the mortgage game. One of the things you will come across when you look for mortgages may be the possibility of mortgage fraud. Now mortgage fraud is not something that happens to everyone, but it is something that you really need to be watching out for. You do not want it to affect you. Here are some of the types of mortgage fraud.

Appraisal Fraud

This is a very common part of mortgage fraud. You may come upon an appraiser who is not honest. They will inflate the value of the property. This is a way of the people who order for the appraisal to get more money off of the house. That is why it is important to have the house appraised on your own terms. It is important for you to pick someone to appraise the house.

Straw Buyers

These are buyers who are not actually the ones using the mortgage. People will bad credit will use these people because they have good credit and can get a better rate and actually qualify for the loan. The original identity of the true borrower is hidden. Straw buyers are generally in on the scam and this will not just take place at one home. Numbers of properties are often purchased.

Flipping

This on the surface is not such a bad thing. A house will be bought, and this will be done legitimately. Then the house will have improvements made to it. Once this is all done the house will be resold quickly after. This is not a bad thing. The problems come when people start lying. They may lie about the improvements as well as the value of the home in general. So if someone has done improvements, they need to accurate inform you of how much the house is now.

Foreclosure Scams

These are the scams that really look to pick on people who have big financial problems. These problems are so large they risk losing there home. The person running the fraud will note this and call up the homeowner. They will tell the owner they can get them out of debt and save their house. Of course, this will come at a fee. When they get the fee the person running the fraud will disappear. This can also come about from someone who offers you a refinance.

Additional Resources:

, , , , , , ,

Mortgage Market Roundup

Posted by P. Jackson on Dec 24th, 2007
2007
Dec 24

As the holiday season is here in full swing, I want to take a quick minute to wish each reader a very joyous season; I know it’s been a tough year for some, a record year for others — whichever camp you’re in, I hope you can find time to spend with friends and family.

Barclay’s throws out $700 billion: In a happy little story published by the UK’s Telegraph, a number of talking heads say that the current crisis facing the mortgage industry (and beyond) may make 1929 look a walk in the park. Buried at the end of the article — I can only presume because the editors at the Tele were too afraid to push it to the intro graph — was this gem:

Goldman Sachs caused shock last month when it predicted that total crunch losses would reach $500bn, leading to a $2 trillion contraction in lending as bank multiples kick into reverse. This already seems humdrum.

“Our counterparties are telling us that losses may reach $700bn,” says Rob McAdie, head of credit at Barclays Capital.

Over at the Calculated Risk blog, CR reiterates his position that losses are likely to even surpass $1 trillion when all is said in done — dwarfing the $160 billion in losses associated with the S&L crisis. Ouch.

More holiday cheer: The Associated Press decided to start the Christmas vacation off with a bang, apparently, using the following lead:

Americans are falling behind on their credit card payments at an alarming rate, sending delinquencies and defaults surging by double-digit percentages in the last year and prompting warnings of worse to come.

What’s “alarming” here? The news agency’s own research found that 30+ day delinquencies at 17 large issuers jumped 26 percent versus year-ago numbers to $17.3 billion — while defaults on credit card debt rose 18 percent to $961 million.

That sound you hear? It might be the other shoe dropping, especially if we’re to believe that consumers are walking away from homes before they default under outstanding credit card debt.

Modification activity up: A Moody’s report (subscription req’d) from earlier in the week found that through the end of September, on average, 3.5 percent of loans that reset in the first eight months of 2007 had been modified versus an August survey that had found only about 1 percent. That’s good.

The same report noted that servicers are still ramping up staff to handle loan modifications, which is in part what’s keeping modification activity so low. That’s bad. Especially when you consider the number of modifications about to result from the rate freeze program put into place.

It’s also a reminder that loan modifications are difficult, often time consuming, and require significant training and resources to do well — which is why you’ll often see higher percentages of loan workouts versus loan modifications coming out of a typical loss mitigation outfit. It’s also why the rate freeze program recently touted by the Treasury Department will strain servicers’ operations — it’s possible you’ll see some negative moves from the rating agencies on servicer ratings in the next quarter, as a result.

Transparency: Gretchen Morgenson over at the NY Times — who I’ve skewered on this blog at least once for an uninformed take on mortgage banking — had a very interesting story about a couple of guys trying to bring transparency to the buy-side of the industry. Their company, FeeDisclosure.com, provides an estimate of average closing costs in an effort help consumers weed out junk fees charged by brokers.

I’d be interested to see if HW readers — those on the consumer-facing side, at least — think this might have legs.

MBIA’s weak defense: After seeing its stock bludgeoned amid a revelation of CDO-squared holdings (see this post for more information), MBIA issued a defense that wasn’t, saying it’s $30.6 billion in CDO exposure had been previously disclosed.

Which is true, of course. What hadn’t been disclosed was that within that $30.6 billion was an $8.1 billion segment, the majority of which represent CDOs-squared. The revelation never was about CDO exposure — it was about the nature of that exposure, and the reputational hit a company like MBIA suffered by not fully disclosing the risks to its business. The world’s largest financial guarantor was, up until this week, widely regarded as the most conservative underwriter in the industry.

Peeking into the future: With a hat tip to Calculated Risk, I recalled that I haven’t yet posted the TFS Housing Metrics report for this past week. It’s worth seeing on many fronts. For one, Radar Logic’s RPX data shows that a 25-city composite is tracking an 11 percent decline in housing prices for 2008. For Miami and Los Angeles, it’s worse: a 19+ percent decline is predicted for each.

The CME futures are also clearly tracking more bearish as of late, with none of the 10 cities being traded (or their composite) tracking a gain in housing prices over the next five years.

Click here for the full report, courtesy of Tradition Financial Services.

Have a great holiday, and I’ll see you on Wednesday.